A timekeeping rollout in aerospace and defense needs to show where labor went and who approved it, alongside the payroll input it provides. Preparing those workflows before configuration gives finance, operations and IT a shared definition of a successful launch.
Assign clear owners before configuration starts
Every rollout needs named owners for labor rules, charge codes, payroll and shop floor supervision. Without that, decisions stall or get made twice. A finance lead should own how direct and indirect codes are defined. A program control lead should own how those codes map to active jobs.
IT should own integrations and access, but not labor policy. Supervisors should own day-to-day approval, not system design. Put those lines in writing so each group understands where its responsibility ends.
Name a coordinator to track open items and test results across groups without taking over policy decisions. A regular review gives the owners a place to resolve conflicts before configuration proceeds. Record the decision and its owner, not just the meeting discussion, so the implementation team has a usable reference.
Map the workforce mix and schedule shapes
Start with how time is recorded today, not how the new tool works. Pull samples from exempt and non-exempt groups, plus hourly and salaried staff. Record who clocks in, who enters hours after the fact and who splits time across programs. Note who works under a union agreement as well.
The schedule inventory may include 9/80 rotations, four-day shifts, night crews and union agreements. Document how each applicable pattern handles holidays, leave and shift differentials. Record existing workarounds too, then decide which workflows to retain or redesign rather than copying every legacy step.
Allow time for supervisors and payroll staff to review the inventory. A schedule name alone is not enough: the implementation team needs examples of ordinary days, holidays and corrections to understand the intended result.
Reconcile attendance against assigned labor
Attendance and labor distribution answer different questions: when someone worked and where the time was assigned. Define how those records reconcile, including separate treatment of leave and other approved exceptions.
For example, a hypothetical 10-hour workday might contain seven hours on a direct job, two on an approved indirect activity and one on training. A day that includes paid leave needs a different reconciliation. Test both cases so reviewers can distinguish expected differences from missing entries.
Supervisors should certify both the hours worked and the split across direct and indirect codes. Leave and approved exceptions should tie out in the same review. When evaluating that workflow, contractors can compare options such as AutoTime using the same split-charging and correction scenarios. Look for a review path that connects an edited entry to its approval and subsequent export.
Define who investigates a mismatch, who corrects it and who confirms the revised totals before the period closes.
Clean charge codes and connect systems
Review charge codes for closed jobs, duplicates, temporary numbers and obsolete test entries. Separate active codes from historical records before migration. Preserve the history reviewers need, but make the entry list reflect current direct jobs and approved indirect, leave and exception categories.
Control who can create codes after that. A small group should issue new job numbers and close completed ones. The timekeeping tool should reject unknown codes at entry and prompt the employee to pick a valid one. That check beats cleanup after payroll.
Interfaces come next. Document the labor data payroll and cost systems need, plus the employee data the timekeeping tool receives. Map fields before building connectors. Test employee IDs, hour categories, project codes and correction transactions with representative records. Compare the exported values with what each destination actually accepts.
Train by role and control the go-live
Training should follow role, not department. Employees need practice entering time, making corrections, requesting leave and handling missed punches. Supervisors need approval, rework, certification and delegation exercises. For administrators, cover code maintenance, reporting, record exports and access reviews. Use fictional training records so participants can practice a full workflow without changing production entries.
For go-live, consider a parallel run covering one or two pay cycles, adjusting the test period to the schedules and exceptions in scope. A pilot on one shift or at one site can help surface issues before wider deployment. Compare gross hours, overtime, leave balances and labor distribution. Investigate differences and agree on acceptance criteria before cutover.
When results match, freeze the legacy system and cut over on a pay period boundary. Keep read-only access to old records for reference. Publish who to call for missed punches, wrong codes, approval delays and shift swaps during the first month. Clear support keeps small errors from becoming habits.
Keep ownership clear after launch
Carry the decision log and support contacts into normal operations. Review recurring errors, update training examples and assign ownership when a new schedule or program changes the workflow. The checklist remains useful when it becomes a maintained reference rather than a document filed away after launch.
Comments are closed.